CUI · 8961196 · J408738/1996 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
OMNIDATA SA
Str. IONITA CEGAN, Nr. 1, Bl. P17, Sc. A, Ap. 2
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 18d agoInactivat: 10 Nov 2017
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
3 representatives- A🇷🇴Administrator
A**** D****
- D🇷🇴Administrator
D** A****
- D🇷🇴Administrator
D** C**** J****
Revenue · 2015
N/A
Net Profit · 2015
-6.0K RON
Employees · 2015
0
Equity · 2015
340.3K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- 0.56
- RE / TA
- 0.12
- EBIT / TA
- 0.03
- Eq / Liab
- 0.29
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2015
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | — | 0 | 1.164.805 -4.5% | 99.116 -12.4% | 1.986.945 +6.7% | 340.289 +95.4% | 0 | 1.392.201 +6.4% | 180.503 +79.8% | 414.241 -8.6% | 3.022 +0.0% | 583.989 +0.0% | — | 91.000 +0.0% | — | 77.951 -97.9% | 77.951 -97.7% | 68.558 -98.0% | 9.393 -36.6% | 5.972 -51.5% |
| 2014 | — | 0 | 1.220.132 +17.4% | 113.155 -21.9% | 1.862.087 +3.6% | 174.143 -45.9% | 0 | 1.308.459 +16.3% | 100.416 -64.6% | 453.212 +16.5% | 3.022 +0.0% | 583.989 +0.0% | — | 91.000 +0.0% | — | 3.741.113 -16.3% | 3.391.613 -24.1% | 3.376.809 -24.3% | 14.804 +83.0% | 12.310 +94.3% |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 1.039.659 -65.7% | 144.925 -19.2% | 1.797.583 -43.1% | 321.882 +2.0% | 0 | 1.125.368 +15.8% | 283.263 -86.0% | 388.952 +144.9% | 3.022 +0.0% | 583.989 | — | 91.000 +0.0% | — | 4.469.494 +2.6% | 4.469.494 +9.8% | 4.461.404 +10.4% | 8.090 -74.7% | 6.336 -76.9% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 3.027.459 | 179.313 | 3.160.670 | 315.546 | 0 | 971.927 | 2.029.919 | 158.824 | 3.022 | — | — | 91.000 | — | 4.356.028 | 4.072.086 | 4.040.051 | 32.035 | 27.461 |