CUI · 6141610 · J4011069/2002 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
TOTAL CORPORATE INVESTMENT GROUP SRL
Str. GURA IALOMIȚEI, Nr. 18, Bl. PC12, Sc. A, Et. 2, Ap. 6
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 32595
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 11 Nov 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- M🇷🇴Administrator
M**** M****
Revenue · 2013
N/A
Net Profit · 2013
5.4K RON
Employees · 2013
5.6K
Equity · 2013
-1.5M RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
32595
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- -4.11
- RE / TA
- -12.42
- EBIT / TA
- 0.05
- Eq / Liab
- -0.84
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2013
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | 5.406 -85.9% | 1.809.352 +0.6% | 184.294 -0.6% | 99.661 +7.5% | -1.525.397 -0.4% | 5.646 -85.3% | — | 92.440 +0.5% | 7.221 +973.0% | — | — | — | 2.000.300 +0.0% | — | 8.000 | 8.000 | 13.406 -65.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 38.431 | 1.797.906 | 185.460 | 92.696 | -1.519.750 | 38.431 | — | 92.023 | 673 | — | — | — | 2.000.300 | — | 0 | 0 | 38.431 | 0 | 0 |