CUI · 38548621 · J4019888/2017 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
APADA SOLUTIONS SRL
Str. LUICA, Nr. 15, Bl. 4, Sc. 2, Et. 6, Ap. 105
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 40982
ANAF Live Status
Synced 8d agoInactivat: 19 Nov 2021
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- M🇷🇴Legal Representative
M**** M****
Revenue · 2019
N/A
Net Profit · 2019
-160 RON
Employees · 2019
N/A
Equity · 2019
-312 RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
40982
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2018
- WC / TA
- -7.35
- RE / TA
- -25.21
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.92
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2019)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | 0 | 166 -0.6% | — | -146 -1142.9% | -312 -103.9% | — | — | — | -146 -1142.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 160 -50.5% | 0 | 160 -50.5% | 160 -50.5% |
| 2018 | — | 0 | 167 +456.7% | — | 14 -93.0% | -153 -190.0% | — | — | — | 14 -93.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 323 +976.7% | 0 | 323 +976.7% | 323 +976.7% |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 30 | — | 200 | 170 | — | — | — | 200 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 30 |