CUI · 38225396 · J4015919/2017 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
FAGECA TRADE SRL
Str. CETATEA DE BALTĂ, Nr. 139-143, Bl. 6, Sc. A, Et. 2, Ap. 9
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 23d agoSource: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- N🇷🇴Administrator
N**** G****
- D🇷🇴Legal Representative
D*** C**** H****
Revenue · 2019
N/A
Net Profit · 2019
-909 RON
Employees · 2019
N/A
Equity · 2019
-3.4K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2019
- WC / TA
- 0.17
- RE / TA
- -0.20
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.16
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2019
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | 0 | 21.025 -8.7% | — | 17.640 -14.2% | -3.385 -36.7% | — | — | 17.420 -12.6% | 220 -65.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 909 -96.6% | 0 | 909 -13.4% | 909 -49.9% |
| 2018 | 25.486 | 0 | 23.025 +1444.3% | — | 20.549 +12663.4% | -2.476 -274.6% | — | — | 19.920 | 629 +290.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 25.486 | 26.536 +2982.0% | 0 | 1.050 +22.0% | 1.815 +110.8% |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 1.491 | 669 | 161 | -661 | — | — | — | 161 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 861 | 0 | 861 | 861 |