CUI · 31016619 · J4014780/2012 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
YANIS LIVE SRL
Șos. GIURGIULUI, Nr. 58-70, Bl. C, Sc. 2, Et. 7, Ap. 66
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 23d agoInactivat: 29 Oct 2014
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- P🇷🇴Administrator
P**** A**** - I****
Revenue · 2017
3.6K RON
Net Profit · 2017
-12.2K RON
Employees · 2017
1
Equity · 2017
-12.2K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -3.60
- RE / TA
- -5.57
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.85
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3.648 -40.2% | 0 | 14.391 +8.2% | — | 2.192 +65.8% | -12.199 -1.9% | 1 +0.0% | -2.710 -305.5% | — | 4.902 +163300.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 3.648 -40.2% | 15.847 -11.6% | 0 | 12.199 +3.1% | 12.199 +1.9% |
| 2016 | 6.097 | 0 -100.0% | 13.295 +327.6% | — | 1.322 +1324.1% | -11.973 -272.2% | 1 -100.0% | 1.319 +1310.1% | — | 3 +200.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 6.097 +124.6% | 17.934 +560.8% | 0 -100.0% | 11.837 | 11.973 |
| 2015 | — | 3.154 +52.4% | 3.109 +45.8% | — | -108 -590.9% | -3.217 -52.5% | 3.217 +52.5% | -109 -595.5% | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.714 +244.9% | 2.714 +244.9% | 5.868 +105.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 2.069 -84.2% | 2.132 -90.7% | — | 22 -99.7% | -2.110 +83.9% | 2.110 -84.1% | 22 -99.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 787 -90.9% | 787 -90.9% | 2.856 -86.8% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 13.093 | 22.823 | 1.315 | 8.408 | -13.100 | 13.300 | 6.008 | 2.200 | 200 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 8.607 | 8.607 | 21.700 | 0 | 0 |