CUI · 30339930 · J407136/2012 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
F.R.A.N. ENERGY RENEWABLE SRL
B-dul UNIRII, Nr. 45, Bl. E3, Sc. 4, Et. 8, Ap. 141
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 30824
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 14 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- C🇮🇹Administrator
C**** F**** R****
Revenue · 2014
N/A
Net Profit · 2014
10 RON
Employees · 2014
10
Equity · 2014
-4.7K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
30824
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2014
- WC / TA
- -78.40
- RE / TA
- -118.62
- EBIT / TA
- 0.24
- Eq / Liab
- -0.99
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2014
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | — | 10 -99.7% | 4.764 -2.1% | 0 | 42 -70.4% | -4.722 +0.0% | 10 -99.7% | — | — | 42 -70.4% | — | — | — | 260 +4.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 10 -99.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 2.923 +63.8% | 4.864 +62.1% | 0 | 142 -90.3% | -4.722 -207.6% | 3.187 +78.5% | — | — | 142 -90.3% | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 8.800 | 8.800 | 11.723 +556.8% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 1.785 | 3.000 | 0 | 1.465 | -1.535 | 1.785 | — | — | 1.465 | — | — | — | 250 | — | 0 | 0 | 1.785 | 0 | 0 |