CUI · 28177470 · J402992/2011 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
BASSMENT TECHNOLOGIES S.R.L.
Șos. MIHAI BRAVU, Nr. 180, Bl. 221, Sc. 1, Et. 1, Ap. 6
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 21342
ANAF Live Status
Synced 24d agoInactivat: 11 Nov 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- K🇷🇴Administrator
K**** T**** Z****
Revenue · 2017
N/A
Net Profit · 2017
9.7K RON
Employees · 2017
N/A
Equity · 2017
1.9K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
21342
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- 0.90
- RE / TA
- 0.77
- EBIT / TA
- 4.54
- Eq / Liab
- 6.35
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | 9.696 | 300 -97.0% | — | 2.204 -0.0% | 1.904 +124.4% | — | — | — | 2.204 -0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 9.997 | 1 +0.0% | 9.996 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2016 | — | 0 | 9.997 -65.5% | — | 2.205 -89.6% | -7.792 +0.0% | — | — | — | 2.205 -89.6% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 28.997 +0.0% | — | 21.205 +0.0% | -7.792 +0.0% | — | — | — | 21.205 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 424 -94.4% | 28.997 | — | 21.205 -21.9% | -7.792 -128.7% | 424 -94.4% | — | — | 21.205 -2.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 424 -95.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 7.560 | 0 -100.0% | — | 27.152 -15.6% | 27.152 -21.9% | 7.608 | — | 5.523 +11406.3% | 21.629 -32.6% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 1.606 -98.8% | 9.166 -90.8% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | 0 | 0 | 879 | 3.484 | 32.154 | 34.759 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 32.106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 129.421 | 131.409 | 100.136 | 31.273 | 27.331 |