CUI · 24233674 · J4012806/2008 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY S.R.L.
Calea Calarasi, Nr. 300, Bl. S20, Sc. 1, Et. 5, Ap. 20
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 30634
ANAF Live Status
Synced 16d agoInactivat: 14 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- B🇷🇴Administrator
B**** E**** - F****
Revenue · 2016
N/A
Net Profit · 2016
-3.2K RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
-35.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
30634
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- -0.95
- RE / TA
- -1.75
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.63
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 56.143 +0.0% | 636 -83.3% | 19.870 +0.0% | -35.637 -9.8% | — | — | 19.842 +0.0% | 28 +3.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 3.174 | 0 -100.0% | 3.174 | 3.174 |
| 2015 | 0 | 3.173 +0.0% | 56.143 +0.0% | 3.811 -45.4% | 19.869 +0.0% | -32.463 -10.8% | — | — | 19.842 +0.0% | 27 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 3.173 +0.0% | 0 | 3.173 +0.0% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | 3.173 -57.5% | 56.142 -0.0% | 6.984 -31.2% | 19.869 +0.0% | -29.289 -12.1% | — | — | 19.842 +0.0% | 27 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 3.173 -57.5% | 0 | 3.173 -57.5% | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 0 -100.0% | 7.462 +106.9% | 56.143 +9.6% | 10.157 -23.8% | 19.869 +3.2% | -26.116 -40.0% | — | — | 19.842 +5.4% | 27 -93.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | 7.462 +16.5% | 0 | 7.462 +106.9% | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 2.800 -88.3% | 3.607 -57.7% | 51.243 -0.7% | 13.331 -23.7% | 19.259 +1.0% | -18.654 -24.0% | — | — | 18.829 -0.7% | 430 +317.5% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 2.800 -88.3% | 6.407 -80.3% | 0 | 3.607 -57.7% | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 24.000 | 8.519 | 51.596 | 17.479 | 19.071 | -15.047 | — | — | 18.968 | 103 | — | — | — | 200 | 24.000 | 32.519 | 0 | 8.519 | 0 | 1 |