CUI · 24113716 · J4011293/2008 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
MGM RISK MANAGEMENT S.R.L.
Str. Gheorghe Petrașcu, Nr. 14, Bl. B9, Sc. 3, Et. P, Ap. 83
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 31597
ANAF Live Status
Synced 11d agoInactivat: 09 Jul 2021
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- C🇷🇴Administrator
C**** M**** - G****
Revenue · 2017
15.7K RON
Net Profit · 2017
-71.5K RON
Employees · 2017
1
Equity · 2017
-130.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
31597
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -3.00
- RE / TA
- -4.69
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.82
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 15.695 +181.2% | 0 | 158.460 +6.4% | 284 -98.5% | 27.344 -61.6% | -130.569 -121.1% | 1 +0.0% | 1.993 -4.5% | 7.638 -88.2% | 17.713 +332.2% | 263 | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 18.325 +165.5% | 89.832 +24.0% | 0 | 71.507 +9.1% | 71.507 +9.1% |
| 2016 | 5.581 -87.7% | 0 -100.0% | 148.970 +30.9% | 18.743 -52.5% | 71.165 -12.0% | -59.062 -1008.8% | 1 | 2.088 +0.0% | 64.979 +0.0% | 4.098 -70.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 6.901 -93.2% | 72.461 | 0 -100.0% | 65.560 | 65.560 +3277900.0% |
| 2015 | 45.536 | 55.589 | 113.780 +41.5% | 39.418 -34.4% | 80.861 -1.8% | 6.499 -89.5% | — | 2.088 +4.8% | 64.979 -8.7% | 13.794 +50.2% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 45.536 | 101.125 -26.7% | 0 -100.0% | 55.589 -52.9% | 0 -100.0% | 2 -100.0% |
| 2014 | — | 0 -100.0% | 80.389 -22.8% | 60.092 -26.0% | 82.383 +20.1% | 62.086 +35.8% | 0 -100.0% | 1.993 +0.0% | 71.206 +13.7% | 9.184 +131.2% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 137.997 +95.1% | 140.085 +97.9% | 117.949 +59.1% | 22.136 | 16.351 |
| 2013 | — | 3.365 +25.2% | 104.074 -3.0% | 81.206 -18.6% | 68.603 +17.1% | 45.735 -10.3% | 5.247 +10.7% | 1.993 +0.0% | 62.637 +24.1% | 3.973 -35.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 70.746 +8.3% | 70.792 -16.4% | 74.157 -15.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | 2.687 | 107.346 | 99.757 | 58.571 | 50.982 | 4.738 | 1.993 | 50.469 | 6.109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 65.353 | 84.663 | 87.350 | 0 | 0 |