CUI · 22792548 · J4021971/2007 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ROCCO MACCHINE SRL
Str. SF. CONSTANTIN, Nr. 1, Et. P, Ap. 1
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 10217
ANAF Live Status
Synced 16d agoInactivat: 25 Feb 2020
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- H🇷🇴Administrator
H** N**** C****
Revenue · 2017
998.5K RON
Net Profit · 2017
-2.7K RON
Employees · 2017
13
Equity · 2017
-129.7K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
10217
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -0.18
- RE / TA
- -0.53
- EBIT / TA
- 0.03
- Eq / Liab
- -0.34
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 998.549 +4.0% | 0 -100.0% | 376.741 -23.3% | 27.519 +39.4% | 219.490 -36.2% | -129.732 -2.1% | 13 +0.0% | 8.996 -45.1% | 104.779 -53.7% | 105.715 +4.2% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 1.006.862 +4.3% | 998.228 +12.9% | 8.634 -89.4% | 0 | 2.683 |
| 2016 | 960.439 +370.0% | 57.438 -41.3% | 491.029 +7.6% | 19.741 +113.7% | 344.239 +31.1% | -127.049 +31.1% | 13 | 16.401 -45.6% | 226.409 +55.2% | 101.429 +17.1% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 965.190 +226.0% | 884.039 | 81.151 -11.6% | 0 | 0 -100.0% |
| 2015 | 204.330 | 97.902 +124.9% | 456.399 +155.7% | 9.238 +283.5% | 262.674 +193.5% | -184.487 -113.1% | — | 30.138 -46.5% | 145.904 +381.1% | 86.632 +2931.2% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | 204.330 | 296.102 +494.5% | 0 -100.0% | 91.772 +10.1% | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | — | 43.531 -50.3% | 178.486 +15.3% | 2.409 -38.5% | 89.492 -18.2% | -86.585 -108.3% | 45.026 -51.1% | 56.308 +11.8% | 30.326 -25.2% | 2.858 -84.5% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 49.806 -67.9% | 39.848 -75.9% | 83.379 -67.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 87.617 +311.5% | 154.818 +514.7% | 3.918 | 109.341 +44.6% | -41.559 -182.4% | 91.985 +332.0% | 50.348 +152.3% | 40.540 +3905.9% | 18.453 -66.2% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 155.291 +1863.0% | 165.315 +1989.7% | 252.932 +766.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 21.294 | 25.184 | — | 75.610 | 50.426 | 21.294 | 19.955 | 1.012 | 54.643 | — | — | — | 300 | — | 7.911 | 7.911 | 29.205 | 0 | 0 |