CUI · 22606742 · J4019703/2007 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
GOOD OPORTUNITIES AND DILLIGENCES - GRUP SRL
Str. Bârca, Nr. 28, Bl. M104, Sc. 1, Et. 10, Ap. 50
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 51177
ANAF Live Status
Synced 17d agoInactivat: 23 Jun 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- A🇷🇴Administrator
A**** L****
- C🇷🇴Administrator
C**** O****
Revenue · 2013
N/A
Net Profit · 2013
1.5K RON
Employees · 2013
1.5K
Equity · 2013
-9.5K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
51177
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- -0.71
- RE / TA
- -0.71
- EBIT / TA
- 3.16
- Eq / Liab
- -0.41
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2013
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | 1.452 -84.3% | 23.224 -60.5% | 7.196 +0.0% | 6.511 -85.1% | -9.517 -18.0% | 1.452 -84.5% | — | 3.136 -92.2% | 3.375 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 41.913 -77.2% | 41.913 -77.2% | 43.365 -77.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 9.264 | 58.857 | 7.196 | 43.596 | -8.065 | 9.345 | — | 40.221 | 3.375 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 183.813 | 183.819 | 193.083 | 0 | 0 |