CUI · 22449591 · J4017769/2007 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
BRAD LUX S.R.L.
Aleea Poarta Alba, Nr. 1-3, Bl. 110, Sc. 2, Et. 8, Ap. 78
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 61162
ANAF Live Status
Synced 14d agoInactivat: 29 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- T🇷🇴Administrator
T**** A****
Revenue · 2015
0 RON
Net Profit · 2015
0 RON
Employees · 2015
N/A
Equity · 2015
69.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
61162
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- 0.99
- RE / TA
- 0.98
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 45.95
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2015
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 1.521 +0.0% | — | 71.417 +0.0% | 69.896 +0.0% | — | 7.713 +0.0% | 293 +0.0% | 63.411 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 291 | 1.521 -5.5% | — | 71.417 -0.2% | 69.896 -0.4% | 291 | 7.713 +3.9% | 293 -1.7% | 63.411 -0.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 291 -98.5% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2013 | — | 0 -100.0% | 1.609 +83.3% | 216 -56.2% | 71.580 +76.9% | 70.187 +75.1% | 0 -100.0% | 7.422 +4.6% | 298 | 63.860 +91.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 50.691 | 50.692 +5069100.0% | 19.062 +1877.4% | 31.630 | 30.102 |
| 2012 | — | 963 | 878 | 493 | 40.470 | 40.085 | 963 | 7.096 | — | 33.374 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 1 | 964 | 0 | 0 |