CUI · 18812612 · J4010668/2006 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
GEOTEK EST S.R.L.
Str. Timpa, Nr. 1, Bl. 1B, Sc. 1, Et. 4, Ap. 27
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 21791
ANAF Live Status
Synced 4d agoInactivat: 06 Jun 2023
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- P🇷🇴Administrator
P**** B**** - M****
Revenue · 2020
N/A
Net Profit · 2020
0 RON
Employees · 2020
N/A
Equity · 2020
-29.7K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
21791
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- -32.74
- RE / TA
- -47.61
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.98
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2020)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | — | 0 | 29.668 +0.0% | — | — | -29.668 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | — | 0 | 29.668 +0.0% | — | — | -29.668 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | — | 0 | 29.668 +0.0% | — | — | -29.668 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 29.668 +0.0% | — | — | -29.668 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2016 | — | 0 | 29.668 +0.3% | — | — | -29.668 -2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | 688 | 0 | 688 | 688 |
| 2015 | 0 | 0 | 29.594 +0.0% | — | 614 +0.0% | -28.980 +0.0% | — | — | — | 614 +0.0% | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 0 -100.0% | 29.594 +0.0% | — | 614 +0.0% | -28.980 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | — | — | 614 +0.0% | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 37.458 +445.5% | 29.594 -12.0% | — | 614 -57.5% | -28.980 -441.8% | 37.458 +445.5% | — | — | 614 -57.5% | — | — | — | 250 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 3.200 -81.6% | 40.658 +67.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 6.867 | 33.626 | 3.158 | 1.446 | 8.478 | 6.867 | — | — | 1.446 | 37.500 | — | — | 250 | — | 17.387 | 17.394 | 24.261 | 0 | 0 |