CUI · 18377667 · J402304/2006 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ROMAFEM S.R.L.
Str. Liviu Rebreanu, Nr. 33, Bl. M14, Sc. 3, Et. 2, Ap. 51
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 31779
ANAF Live Status
Synced 24d agoInactivat: 14 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- G🇷🇴Administrator
G**** Ş**** F****
Revenue · 2014
N/A
Net Profit · 2014
-95 RON
Employees · 2014
0
Equity · 2014
-21.5K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
31779
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2014
- WC / TA
- -0.28
- RE / TA
- -0.85
- EBIT / TA
- 0.25
- Eq / Liab
- -0.46
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2014
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | — | 0 -100.0% | 47.311 -1.3% | — | 25.784 +5.3% | -21.527 +0.4% | 0 -100.0% | — | 24.685 +8.2% | 1.099 -33.8% | — | — | — | 500 +0.0% | — | 6.644 -74.5% | 6.645 -74.5% | 6.350 -86.8% | 295 | 95 |
| 2013 | — | 22.146 | 47.943 +114.9% | — | 24.485 +3.9% | -21.622 -1835.3% | 22.868 | — | 22.824 +116.3% | 1.661 -87.2% | 1.836 | — | — | 500 +0.0% | — | 26.083 -0.0% | 26.084 -0.1% | 48.230 +118.5% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 22.311 | — | 23.557 | 1.246 | 0 | — | 10.551 | 13.006 | — | — | — | 500 | — | 26.092 | 26.120 | 22.071 | 4.049 | 4.049 |