CUI · 17526523 · J407800/2005 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
TRAHO SERV S.R.L.
Str. Borșa, Nr. 47, Bl. 7H, Sc. 1, Ap. 1
BUCUREȘTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 14174
ANAF Live Status
Synced 13d agoInactivat: 26 Mar 2019
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- N🇷🇴Administrator
N**** H****
- N🇷🇴Administrator
N**** M**** - D****
Revenue · 2019
N/A
Net Profit · 2019
-120 RON
Employees · 2019
N/A
Equity · 2019
4.2K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCUREȘTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
14174
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2019
- WC / TA
- 0.98
- RE / TA
- 0.92
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 29.50
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2019
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | 0 | 143 | — | 4.362 +0.5% | 4.219 -2.8% | — | 23 | — | 4.339 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 120 |
| 2018 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.339 +0.0% | 4.339 +0.0% | — | — | — | 4.339 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.339 +0.0% | 4.339 +0.0% | — | — | — | 4.339 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2016 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.339 -7.4% | 4.339 -7.4% | — | — | — | 4.339 -7.4% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 346 | 0 | 346 | 346 |
| 2015 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.685 -0.0% | 4.685 -0.0% | 0 | — | — | 4.685 -0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.686 +0.0% | 4.686 +0.0% | 0 | — | — | 4.686 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.686 +0.0% | 4.686 +0.0% | 0 | — | — | 4.686 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4.686 | 4.686 | 0 | — | — | 4.686 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |