CUI · 17293320 · J403838/2005 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
MAXIM COMERT S.R.L.
Aleea Mirea Mioara Luiza, Nr. 5, Bl. 6, Sc. 1, Et. 8, Ap. 67
BUCUREȘTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 41531
ANAF Live Status
Synced 11d agoInactivat: 03 May 2018
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- Ş🇷🇴Administrator
Ş**** D****
Revenue · 2016
269.6K RON
Net Profit · 2016
-69.2K RON
Employees · 2016
1
Equity · 2016
-213.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCUREȘTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
41531
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- -0.59
- RE / TA
- -2.98
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.56
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 269.600 +39.2% | 0 -100.0% | 166.882 -35.2% | — | -46.709 -141.2% | -213.591 -48.0% | 1 | -67.730 -159.8% | — | 21.021 +11262.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 269.600 +40.2% | 330.730 +23456.3% | 0 | 61.130 | 69.248 +6924700.0% |
| 2015 | 193.678 | 4.406 -79.4% | 257.726 +27.4% | — | 113.383 +81.6% | -144.343 -3.1% | — | 113.198 +81.8% | — | 185 +3.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 193.678 | 192.274 +84.6% | 1.404 -98.7% | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | — | 21.379 -3.6% | 202.375 +75.0% | — | 62.438 +27405.7% | -139.937 -21.2% | 24.504 -5.0% | 62.260 +69077.8% | — | 178 +29.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 104.179 -19.2% | 104.179 -19.2% | 125.558 -16.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 22.177 -56.6% | 115.660 +28.2% | — | 227 -62.8% | -115.433 -28.8% | 25.806 -49.5% | 90 -79.5% | — | 137 -20.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 128.978 +277.1% | 128.978 +164.8% | 151.155 +51.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 51.089 | 90.237 | — | 610 | -89.627 | 51.089 | 438 | — | 172 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 34.201 | 48.709 | 99.798 | 0 | 0 |