CUI · 16622786 · J4021511/2004 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
BELLA HOLDING S.R.L.
Str. ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT, Nr. 18
BUCUREȘTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 31472
ANAF Live Status
Synced 17d agoInactivat: 14 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- M🇬🇷Administrator
M**** M****
- S🇷🇴Administrator
S**** K**** S****
Revenue · 2017
N/A
Net Profit · 2017
-500 RON
Employees · 2017
N/A
Equity · 2017
-105.2K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCUREȘTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
31472
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- -1480.29
- RE / TA
- -2182.47
- EBIT / TA
- 20508.84
- Eq / Liab
- -1.00
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2017)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | 0 | 105.236 +0.5% | — | — | -105.236 -0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.300 +0.0% | — | 0 | 500 +0.0% | 0 | 500 +0.0% | 500 +0.0% |
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 104.736 +0.5% | — | — | -104.736 -0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.300 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 500 | 0 -100.0% | 500 | 500 |
| 2015 | 0 | 500 +426.3% | 104.236 +0.5% | — | — | -104.236 -0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.300 +0.0% | — | 500 | 0 | 500 +426.3% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 95 | 103.736 +0.0% | — | — | -103.736 -0.1% | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.300 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 95 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2013 | — | 0 -100.0% | 103.690 -94.1% | — | 49 -100.0% | -103.641 +86.5% | 0 -100.0% | — | — | 49 -19.7% | — | — | — | 3.300 +0.0% | — | 0 | 1.667.989 | 1.004.933 +61666.0% | 663.056 | 663.056 |
| 2012 | — | 1.627 | 1.772.175 | — | 1.005.478 | -766.697 | 1.627 | — | 1.005.417 | 61 | — | — | — | 3.300 | — | 0 | 0 | 1.627 | 0 | 0 |