CUI · 16173342 · J402884/2004 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
STAR ENGINEERING & CONSULTING S.R.L.
Str. Stefan Negulescu, Nr. 16
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 11653
ANAF Live Status
Synced 14d agoInactivat: 02 Feb 2017
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- Ş🇷🇴Administrator
Ş**** D**
Revenue · 2015
0 RON
Net Profit · 2015
10.9K RON
Employees · 2015
N/A
Equity · 2015
-61.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
11653
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- -9.19
- RE / TA
- -13.60
- EBIT / TA
- 2.39
- Eq / Liab
- -0.93
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2015
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0 | 10.940 +28.9% | 66.502 +19.4% | — | 4.568 -3.0% | -61.934 -21.5% | — | 1.174 +1.6% | 3.922 -0.3% | -528 -39.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 10.940 +186.0% | 0 -100.0% | 10.940 -11.2% | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | — | 8.489 +69.3% | 55.705 +18.8% | — | 4.710 +4.3% | -50.995 -20.3% | 8.604 +60.7% | 1.155 | 3.934 -6.5% | -379 -222.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 3.825 -66.1% | 3.827 -66.1% | 12.316 -24.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 5.015 -68.1% | 46.908 +6.6% | — | 4.517 -35.1% | -42.391 -14.5% | 5.354 -66.3% | — | 4.208 -11.8% | 309 -85.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 11.291 +100.6% | 11.305 +97.5% | 16.320 -24.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 15.739 | 44.001 | — | 6.964 | -37.037 | 15.908 | — | 4.773 | 2.191 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 5.628 | 5.723 | 21.462 | 0 | 0 |