CUI · 15680339 · J4011281/2003 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
FARCOMP INFORMATICA SI CALCULATOARE SRL
Str. Thomas Masaryk, Nr. 18, Ap. 3
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 20985
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 26 Mar 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- F🇷🇴Administrator
F**** C****
Revenue · 2018
0 RON
Net Profit · 2018
0 RON
Employees · 2018
N/A
Equity · 2018
0 RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
20985
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -3.87
- RE / TA
- -6.18
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.86
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2018)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 +100.0% | — | — | 0 -100.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 -100.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | 0 | 6.033 +0.0% | — | 868 +0.0% | -5.165 +0.0% | — | — | 868 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 6.033 +0.0% | — | 868 +0.0% | -5.165 +0.0% | — | — | 868 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | — | 378 -77.6% | 6.033 -5.2% | 0 -100.0% | 868 -42.7% | -5.165 -7.9% | 378 -77.6% | — | 868 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | 378 -77.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 1.685 -42.5% | 6.364 +16.3% | 63 -92.3% | 1.514 -2.6% | -4.787 -54.3% | 1.685 -49.6% | — | 868 +26.2% | 646 -25.5% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 1.685 -89.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 2.931 | 5.472 +207.4% | 815 -48.0% | 1.555 -80.7% | -3.102 -139.5% | 3.342 | — | 688 | 867 -89.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 13.710 -66.7% | 13.710 -67.5% | 16.641 -48.4% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 1.780 | 1.568 | 8.075 | 7.863 | 0 | — | — | 8.075 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 41.129 | 42.166 | 32.263 | 9.903 | 7.623 |