CUI · 14525507 · J402135/2002 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
DIT CONT SRL
Str. Dumbrava Nouă, Nr. 25, Bl. M142, Sc. 1, Et. P, Ap. 2
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 51145
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 06 Jun 2023
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- D🇷🇴Administrator
D**** I**
Revenue · 2016
19.3K RON
Net Profit · 2016
8.2K RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
8.5K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
51145
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.53
- RE / TA
- 0.69
- EBIT / TA
- 0.81
- Eq / Liab
- 2.35
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 19.280 +53.9% | 8.238 | 3.604 +437.1% | 2.865 -27.6% | 8.961 -78.8% | 8.478 -81.5% | — | 44 -98.1% | 1.290 +88.0% | 7.627 -80.6% | 256 -7.9% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 19.280 +68.4% | 9.472 +776.2% | 9.808 | 0 -100.0% | 0 |
| 2015 | 12.529 | 0 -100.0% | 671 -0.4% | 3.955 -21.6% | 42.272 +4.6% | 45.834 +2.0% | — | 2.270 | 686 +148.6% | 39.316 -2.0% | 278 +107.5% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 12.510 | 11.448 -3.9% | 1.081 -90.9% | 0 -100.0% | 918 | — |
| 2014 | — | 1.041 | 674 -48.8% | 5.044 -17.8% | 40.412 -2.6% | 44.916 -2.3% | 1.041 | — | 276 -82.7% | 40.136 +0.6% | 134 +140.2% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 11.915 -63.5% | 11.915 -63.5% | 12.956 +0.2% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 1.317 +15.7% | 6.133 -15.1% | 41.474 +80.7% | 45.957 +56.1% | 0 | — | 1.593 -66.2% | 39.881 +118.8% | -333 -182.6% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 32.645 -31.0% | 32.649 -31.4% | 12.926 -66.5% | 19.723 +117.5% | 16.524 +117.1% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 1.138 | 7.222 | 22.946 | 29.433 | 0 | — | 4.719 | 18.227 | 403 | — | — | 200 | — | 47.330 | 47.610 | 38.543 | 9.067 | 7.610 |