CUI · 13304001 · J407827/2000 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
AGENTIA DE CONSULTANTA SI MARKETING SRL
Calea Victoriei, Nr. 128B, Ap. 9
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 13d agoSource: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- D🇷🇴Administrator
D**** A****
- H🇷🇴Administrator
H**** G****
Revenue · 2014
N/A
Net Profit · 2014
5.4K RON
Employees · 2014
5.4K
Equity · 2014
-1.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2014
- WC / TA
- 0.25
- RE / TA
- -0.04
- EBIT / TA
- 0.09
- Eq / Liab
- -0.03
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2014
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | — | 5.440 +35.7% | 59.430 +0.0% | 1.667 -28.4% | 55.853 -7.9% | -1.910 -154.1% | 5.440 +35.7% | — | 8.246 +0.0% | 47.607 -9.1% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 5.440 -32.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 4.009 -27.1% | 59.430 +0.0% | 2.328 -22.1% | 60.632 -5.2% | 3.530 -53.2% | 4.009 -27.1% | — | 8.246 -0.3% | 52.386 -5.9% | — | — | — | 300 +0.0% | — | 4.000 -23.1% | 4.065 -23.0% | 8.074 -25.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 5.499 | 59.402 | 2.988 | 63.953 | 7.539 | 5.499 | — | 8.273 | 55.680 | — | — | — | 300 | — | 5.200 | 5.276 | 10.775 | 0 | 0 |