CUI · 11548050 · J401942/1999 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
MAGI-PESCARU SRL
Str. Uioara, Nr. 3, Bl. M2, Sc. 7, Et. 4, Ap. 254
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 41012
ANAF Live Status
Synced 15d agoInactivat: 02 Nov 2018
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- P🇷🇴Administrator
P**** M****
Revenue · 2016
164.5K RON
Net Profit · 2016
114.5K RON
Employees · 2016
1
Equity · 2016
100.3K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
41012
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.93
- RE / TA
- 0.90
- EBIT / TA
- 1.08
- Eq / Liab
- 9.62
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 164.536 | 114.547 +4467.3% | 10.434 -75.8% | — | 110.784 +283.7% | 100.350 +806.8% | 1 -100.0% | 30.830 +10.8% | 14.076 | 65.878 +6162.2% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 164.536 +47.8% | 45.052 -59.5% | 119.484 +5.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | — | 2.508 -20.5% | 43.071 +49.2% | — | 28.874 +40.7% | -14.197 -70.0% | 5.847 +7.3% | 27.822 +35.6% | — | 1.052 | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 111.290 +45.5% | 111.290 +45.5% | 113.798 +42.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 3.154 +17.2% | 28.875 +285.1% | — | 20.525 +346.5% | -8.350 -187.8% | 5.449 +101.6% | 20.525 +347.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 76.505 +17015.2% | 76.505 +17015.2% | 79.659 +2439.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 2.690 | 7.498 +3539.8% | — | 4.597 +57362.5% | -2.901 -1365.2% | 2.703 | 4.589 | 8 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 447 | 447 | 3.137 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 206 | — | 8 | -198 | 0 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |