CUI · 11417780 · J40823/1999 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
VIRGILIU & CO SRL
Str. Cara Anghel, Nr. 8, Bl. B9, Sc. 2, Et. 2, Ap. 24
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 61644
ANAF Live Status
Synced 14d agoInactivat: 12 Jul 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- H🇷🇴Administrator
H**** V****
- Ţ🇷🇴Administrator
Ţ*** C****
Revenue · 2013
N/A
Net Profit · 2013
26.9K RON
Employees · 2013
30.9K
Equity · 2013
73.4K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
61644
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- 0.90
- RE / TA
- 0.97
- EBIT / TA
- 1.73
- Eq / Liab
- 30.63
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2013
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | 26.874 | 2.397 -90.5% | 5.924 -89.5% | 69.889 -4.6% | 73.416 -29.6% | 30.930 | 1.009 -83.9% | 29.934 +14.7% | 38.946 -4.8% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 102.877 -41.5% | 104.015 -40.9% | 130.889 -4.5% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 25.196 | 56.291 | 73.251 | 104.346 | 0 | 6.256 | 26.089 | 40.906 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 175.954 | 175.966 | 137.006 | 38.960 | 33.224 |